Joseph still deserves praise, but Chris deserves a little for being so ahead of the game...
This afternoon I was sitting in the department waiting for some copies to finish and picked up "The Chronicle of Higher Education"(one of those throw-away rags that sits on the table so that people can read through it).
Interestingly enough, I found an article inside called "The Blogoshpere as a Carnival of Ideas".
In which the author, Henry Farrell (a professor of political science) discusses the validity of blogs in the academic world.
I include some excerpts, but if you want the whole article, let me know. I'll be happy to copy it and send it off to anyone interested.
This is a summary of some of the things he said:
Farrell begins by mentioning the general fear that many academics (especially those in the job market or non-tenured ones) have of blogging due to their fear of discipline for expressing controversial or original views.
Farrel argues that blogs serve several purposes, he says:
"Academic bloggers differ in their goals. Some are blogging to get personal or professional grievances off their chests or, to propose non-academic interests. Others, perhaps the majority, see blogging as an extension of their academic personas. Their Blogs allow them not only to express personal views but also to debate ideas, swap views about their disciplines, and connect to a wider public. For these academics, blogging isn't a hobby; it's an integral part of their scholarly identity. They may very well be the wave of the future."
Farrell provides some statistics for poly-sci and law majors at George Washington University. He said that 130 law professors have active blogs and that those who don't read blogs or maintain blogs of their own are cutting themselves out of important discussions.
He suggests that blogs have been slow to enter areas like the social sciences but believes that they will enter and expand soon.
Farrell believes that blogs can be exciting and free forums of discussion and idea sharing without the nasty grant proposals, project approvals, and publishing reviews which often slow the flow of ideas. Blogs provide a nice area of conversation around and between articles and monographs.
Blogging also provides a flexibility and freedom that publishing does not allow. Farrell considers the vast amount of time it takes to publish in a peer-reviewed journal, stating that years can pass by between a first draft and a publication....(cough...Spotten Cave..cough). He also considers the fact that years may go by while other academics are publishing reactions to a publication. In the blogosphere, these publications and reactions can take minutes.
In addition to rapid results, blogs provide new academics or blossoming students a chance to make their voices and opinions heard. Blogging provides students, academics and amateurs semi-equal footing to enter into a forum to discuss ideas. Farrell says, "This openness may be discomfiting to those who are attached to established rankings and rituals-but it also means that blogosphereic conversations, when they're good, have a vigor and a liveliness that most academic discussion lacks."
Farrell concludes that blogs allow academics to reconnect with the public. Blogging makes intelectualism more democratic, and an academic (with some good ideas and some self-promotion) can enter into public debate quickly. He also notes that while blogging will not replace publishing anytime soon, it provides an excellent environment for the exchange of ideas.
Sorry this is so long, but the article was very well written and seems to be in keeping with the main intent of this blog. I think Chris has done an excellent thing here by creating such a forum, the type that is garnering praise from a nationwide academic newspaper (throw-away or not).
I think that FoF, provides us all with an excellent opportunity to not only keep in touch with one another, but to also kick around ideas about our archaeological pursuits.
So, well done Chris.
If any of you would like a copy, send me an e-mail, and I'll send one off.
8 comments:
Well said Mr. Woods. Long live the Fremont and blogs and Chris. By the way Chris, are you finding it as hard to finish up your thesis as I am?
The thesis is sucking right now, and mine is due in 2 weeks. I think I'm going to have to take some time off of work to finish, which I can't afford to do, but I really have no choice.
Thanks for the praise, but I'd like to turn it back onto all the ACTIVE Friends of the Fremont. You guys make the blog work, and I look forward to the students of tomorrow parsing through our archives for article ideas. I'd also like to praise Aaron for finding such an interesting and relevant article. Here is a link to it.
http://chronicle.com/weekly/v52/i07/07b01401.htm
To all the inactive Friends of the Fremont, screw you and I hope you get active. Suck it Holly!
Chris,
I tried to access the link, and it is password protected. Did you use a different link? Did you use a password?
edit: Chris just told me that he was on ASU campus when he accesed the article. So, who knows if BYU subscribes to it.
If you haven't noticed, I have commented on the Friends of the Fremont blog frequently. I am an active member of this blog, the crapster of crapsters (Aaron) mis-represented me when he said that I only check the blog when I am reminded to. So, I believe Aaron should suck "it".
Whatever. When was the last time you created a post? Lurker.
I'll answer my own question,
Septemeber 15th, before that...August 15th, before that....April 30th.
To your credit, you've had a massive spike in activity in the last two months.
I will concede that Holly does comment frequently. She also checks the blog without prompting.
This statement was not made under duress and was my of my own free will.
Don't you feel better now, Aaron? Now you can sleep peacefully at night. The truth shall set you free.
Post a Comment