Gibson may be a drunk, but has a good idea

I just wanted to respond to Aaron's post as well as comments to his post on Apocolypto, since I have a heightened interest in this field.

OK. First, I guarantee that Apocolypto will not be any where close to accurate. We still don't know what accurate is in the Mayan region. Population size, the existence of a proto-Mayan language, and the "collapse" are all areas that are still heavily debated. I am convenced there is no final definition of Mayan culture nor that it will be depicted in the movie. But, this film is building on a known genre, that of "historical drama." In this case, it would be more appropriate to call it "PRE-historical drama," an entirely uncharted style that could aid archaeologists in the ever-dreaded search for funding.

This is where I think we can really make headway in getting the general public involved in archaeology and where Mel Gibson is creating a new type of film that gets us all thinking a little harder about the big picture when it comes to prehistoric cultural groups (i.e., how they all interacted, what it may have looked like, what the language may have sounded like, etc.)

Now, in reference to Gibson's actions, I think he has a problem, and like all Hollywood types, will do the rehab shuffle and be on his way. They are smart to postpone the release of the film. This is likely to our benefit. Unfortunately, the Mayan region already gets lots of funding. What is needed are more films about lesser-known cultures or a television program that highlights these cultures. As the public gets interested in these areas, they will be more likely to support research through volunteered help or funding.

The big question is "how do we make this appeal to the mass public." That is the main challenge, but I am pretty sure it is not simply through public lectures and other traditional community events, although they are very important to continue. Listen to this segment that was on NPR where Leon Lederman confronts a similar issue dealing with public interest in the general field of science. He says that TV is a "medium that would be magical for our society" if it focused on educating the public, but as we all know, this is currently not the case.

Until we can solve that problem, we will be left with the difficulty of scrounging for money from the usual suspects. I vote for the popularizing of archaeology for our benefit and job security. This may sound selfish, but at the same time we will continue in our scientific pursuits of filling in the blanks of prehistory and preserving the past.