Wednesday, February 15, 2006

A Moving Chronological Southwestern Map

I've been thinking lately about the different fluctuations in the population of Southwestern traditions. Lekson has his opinions on major migrations of people through time (See Chaco Meridian). Most agree that at one point or another there were also migrations from the Western Anasazi area to the East (Rio Grande Valley). I feel that mobility was very common, but studies on interaction between groups are limited to discussions about trade or design similarities. There must have been more people moving around that area than we think. These people had to have been used to tramping around for weeks, covering many miles of terrain. It also seems logical that there may have been a ton of interaction between different contemporaneous groups.

For me, it is hard to visualize what groups (or areas of the SW) were in "full-swing" at particular times. It seems that the groups who were contemporaneous, especially while sustaining large populations, most likely had contact with groups in similar situations. For example, there was an increase in population at Chaco Canyon during its Pueblo II phase and peaking out with the completed construction of Pueblo Bonito during the Classic Bonito phase. Hohokam Snaketown, during its Sedentary period/phase also reached its greatest size around the same time. These plateaus in population size (if you attribute largest population size to maximum number of structures or largest building phases of structures) both occurred roughly between 920-1150. If we succumb to the discussions of population stress and the like, it would seem likely that groups would be venturing out to find more arable land to farm and less stressed food sources (game, wild plants, etc.). In the process, there would be interaction between and among groups.

So, here is my idea. Like I said earlier, I have a hard time visualizing which groups were at their population peak at which times. I've been thinking of building a moving map of the Southwest in Adobe AfterEffects or Flash that shows how these major centers of activity grew and shrank over time. By doing so, we get a better idea of how and when these groups might have interacted or when divisions and migrations may have occurred due to ecological stress. It seems ominous to collect all of the information on this, but would prove useful, maybe only on a teaching level, showing how these groups emerged, blossomed, and later abandoned their homes. Let me know what you guys think.

3 comments:

PBN said...

Mike,

Sounds like a really cool and useful idea. When some of us were in the SW Seminar class, Jim had a lower-tech version of what you are talking about. It was a map with different cultural groups colored in. To be honest, I think it was limited to ethnographic records too. Chris or Cady may remember better that I.

Let's see the high tech version!

Mr. Yoder said...

That would be very helpful. How would you decide where the edges of each group expanded and contracted through time? Meaning, do you want to make it a really exact thing by mapping each groups sites through time, or a more general, "they were around here around this time" type thing. Both would be useful, but I think the more exact one would be difficult. Well, not so much difficult, as time consuming.

Mo said...

I think that is a great idea. The British Museum has done something similar (but in my opinion they did a pretty crappy job of it) with world civilizations through time. They have a different map for writing, architecture, etc showing over time each topic appears in various locations. (see: http://www.ancientcivilizations.co.uk/ home_set.html ) I had actually been thinking about how to take the same idea and make it better for the past few months. I think it'd be extremely helpful for a bunch of different subjects.